🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 688+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (688 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$71.2
$118.67
Sale
βœ“ complimentary distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin

None​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 934561

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price: $118.67 USD

Sale Price:$71.2 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5035 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young
4 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
For the price, the Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin does its job and I’m satisfied.
20 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
I use the Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin regularly at this moment.
1 people found this helpful
SA
Samantha Adams βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice
Quality seems okay. The Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin hasn’t disappointed.
7 people found this helpful
AP​
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
The Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin is exactly as advertised.
15 people found this helpful
SL
Stephanie Lewis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
After some use, the Retro Flower Alloy Inlay Rhinestones Hairpin works well enough so it’s acceptable. Packaging was plain.
5 people found this helpful